Rogers v. State

In the trial court appellant was charged by an affidavit in three counts; No. 1 being for second degree burglary, No. 2 automobile banditry, and No. 3 habitual criminal.

We note that the motion to quash treats the affidavit as though it were composed of a single count instead of three. We cannot know to which count appellant intended the motion to apply. Presumably the trial court was in the same situation. In addition to this, in his “Propositions, Points and Authorities” appellant wholly omits to discuss in any way the ruling on the motion to quash. We find no error in the court’s action in…