Legal Opinion

Hickman v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 2004No. E2002-01916-SC-R11-PCPublishedCited by 595 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, C.J.,

delivered the opinion of the court,

in which E. RILEY ANDERSON, ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., JANICE M. HOLDER, and WILLIAM M. BARKER, JJ., joined.

We granted Roger L. Hickman permission to appeal to consider whether the trial court and Court of Criminal Appeals erred in dismissing his habeas corpus petition. Hickman’s petition, prepared with the aid of counsel, alleged that his. 1986 misdemeanor conviction, for which he received a ten-day suspended sentence, is void because the judgment does not affirmatively indicate that Hickman was represented by counsel or that…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Archer v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1993

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by595 opinions

  1. Summers v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State of Tennessee v. Adrian R. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Hogan v. MillsTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Terrance Lavar Davis v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Moody v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2005

590 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API