Legal Opinion

Lansing v. Schenectady Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 12, 1902Published

Action by-Caroline Paige Lansing against the Schenectady Railway Company.

1Per curiam

Order (77 N. Y. Supp. 889) reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion to vacate injunction denied, with $10 costs. Injunction modified by striking out that part thereof which reads as follows: “And that they be further enjoined.- and restrained, until the further order of the-court, from interfering with the restoration of the street by the plaintiff herein, and from, in any way using the pole which it has put upon the premises,”—upon opinion in Paige v. Railway Co. (decided herewith) 79 N. Y. Supp, 266.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Paige v. Schenectady Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1902