Burchanowski v. County of Lycoming
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Crumlish, Jr.,
This is an appeal from a decision and order of the court of common pleas holding, inter alia, that a housewife is engaged in an “occupation” within the meaning of The Local Tax Enabling Act. Because of the procedural posture of the case, we do not reach the merits of that holding, but dismiss the appeal as nonjustieiable.
Plaintiffs, husband and wife, are residents of defendants Borough of' Montoursville, Montoursville Area School District, and Lycoming. County. Valentine Burchanowski is employed but his wife, Mary, is not, except as a housewife. In July, 1975,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cablevision—Division of Sammons Communications, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
3Cited by8 opinions
- Eck v. Powermatic HoudailleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Lower Allen Citizens Action Group, Inc. v. Lower Allen Township Zoning Hearing Board & Hempt Bros.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Green by Green v. SeptaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Clairton Corp. v. Chicago Title InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.