(SS) Van Groningen v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 SHELLY VITALI VAN GRONINGEN, Case No. 1:21-cv-01377-CDB (SS) o/b/o M.A.V., 9 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION Plaintiff, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND 10 AFFIRMING THE COMMISSIONER v. 11 (Docs. 21, 25) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 12 SECURITY, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Shelly Vitali Van Groningen on behalf of her minor son M.A.V. (“Plaintiff”) seeks 16 judicial review of the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or 17 “Defendant”) denying Plaintiff’s application for Title XVI Supplemental Security Income…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Tommasetti v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.