Quigley v. Gorham
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Twelfth Judicial District, San Francisco County.
1Opinion of the CourtHeydenfeldt, J.
Murray, C. J., concurred.
The words of a statute must be interpreted according to their common acceptation. In the Act which exempts certain articles from execution, the term “ wagon” is intended to mean a common vehicle for the transportation of goods, wares, and merchandize of all descriptions. A hackney coach used for the conveyance of passengers is a different article, and does not come within the equity or literal meaning of the Act.
Judgment reversed, and canse remanded;
2Cited by6 opinions
- In Re HermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Cone v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Perrin v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Equitable Life Ins. v. GleasonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
- In Re GundelfingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.