Legal Opinion

State v. R. J. C. (In re R. J. C.)

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 16, 2019No. A166502Published

1Per curiam

*740Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him to the custody of the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days, raising a challenge to the sufficiency of the state's proof that he is a person with mental illness within the meaning of ORS 426.005(1)(f). In its oral pronouncement at the commitment hearing, the court found that defendant was not a danger to himself, but that it was "going to find that he is a danger to others and order that he be committed." However, the judgment entered that same day, which is a check-the-box form, reflects the opposite: that appellant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. D. Z.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. State v. E.A. (In re E.A.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API