Legal Opinion

State v. Daegele

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 8, 1962No. 43,114PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Price, J.:

The defendant, George William Daegele, upon his plea of guilty, was convicted in the district court of Douglas county of the offense of forcible rape (G. S. 1949, 21-424). This appeal followed.

Throughout all proceedings in the district court defendant was represented by court-appointed counsel. In his appeal to this court, however, he appears pro se, and has filed a number of handwritten documents. Among them are a purported abstract and brief. Because of the inadequacy of defendant’s “abstract” to show the proceedings in the district court,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blevins v. DaughertySupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  2. State v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. DaegeleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  2. Donnell v. SwensonDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1966
  3. George William Daegele v. Sherman H. Crouse, Warden, Kansas State Penitentiary, Lansing, Kansas,appelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  4. State v. DaegeleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API