Legal Opinion

Back v. Bank of Jamestown

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 16, 1931PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Clay

•Affirming.

On December 30,1926, M. Back, Rosa Back, bis wife, and T. H. Back, executed and delivered to the Bank of Jamestown their promissory note by which they agreed to pay five months after date $4,200 with 6 per cent, interest from maturity. At the same time they secured the note by a second mortgage on two tracts of land located in Russell county. The makers having defaulted in the payment of the debt, the Bank of Jamestown brought this suit in the Russell Circuit Court to recover on the note and enforce its mortgage lien. M. Back and Rosa Back were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Blossom v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1866
  2. Williams v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1875
  3. Barbee v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1881

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Daniels v. LandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API