Legal Opinion
Ambrester v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided November 27, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice MgKiNNey
By this proceeding the petitioner, Harry Ambrester, asks that twenty-five cases, or seventy-five gallons of bottled and bond whisky, which was illegally seized by the sheriff of Marion County, be restored to his possession. We quote from the petition as follows:
“Petitioner avers that the said liquors, when thus seized and taken from his possession, were within his curtilage or the grounds immediately surrounding his place of residence, and that the same were seized and removed without a search warrant authorizing such, or without any legal authority for such, and that he has a right to have…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. BassTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
- Homolko v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
- Caneperi v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
3Cited by5 opinions
- McCanless, Com'r v. EvansTennessee Supreme Court · 1941
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- United States v. FineDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1968
- Alcoholic Beverage Commission v. SimmonsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1973
- Muzzall v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1956