Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Massachusetts Real Estate Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 3, 1946No. 34,188PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Chief Justice.

This case is here on certiorari from the industrial commission. A claim for compensation was filed with the commission and referred to and heard by a referee. He made findings that the injury to petitioner did not arise out of and in the course of employment. On appeal, the industrial commission adopted and affirmed the findings of the referee.

Petitioner had several employers and worked as janitor, fire tender, and general handy man in their apartment houses, which were within three blocks of each other in the city of Duluth. He would do the work in one apartment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nesbitt v. Twin City Forge & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Saari v. Dunwoody Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Youngberg v. Donlin Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API