Legal Opinion

Parsi v. Daioleslam

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 8, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2008-0705PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.

Before the Court is [194] defendant Seid Hassan Daioleslam’s final bill of recoverable costs. Pursuant to [190] [191] the Court’s September 13, 2012 Memorandum Opinion and Order, 286 F.R.D. 73 (D.D.C. 2012), granting in part and denying in part defendant’s omnibus motion for sanctions, defendant seeks reimbursement for the following: (1) 60% of the expenses of bringing [143] defendant’s omnibus sanctions motion; (2) the last two rounds of forensic imaging by PricewaterhouseCoopers (“PwC”); (3) the expenses of bringing [112] [113]…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  3. Taniguchi v. Kan Pacific Saipan, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Oldham v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  5. DL v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Trita Parsi v. Seid Hassan DaioleslamCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API