Legal Opinion

Klair v. Klair

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County

Decided January 2, 1923No. 463Published

1Opinion of the Court

WiCKERSHAM, J.,

The reasons alleged for the divorce are cruel and barbarous treatment and indignities to the persons of the libellant, also “that the said respondent, Samuel S. Klair, hath given himself up to adulterous practices and hath committed adultery with one ... at the City *420of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and with divers other persons at divers times and places.”

The subpoena issued in this case was served personally on the respondent, whereupon, on certificate of counsel for the libellant, the court appointed George V. Hoover, Esq., master. Having performed his duties as required by law…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Middleton v. MiddletonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  2. Richards v. RichardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1860
  3. Biddle v. BiddleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  4. Naylor v. NaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. Edgar v. EdgarSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API