Legal Opinion
AGA SHAREHOLDERS, LLC v. CSK Auto, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 14, 2006No. 06 C 835PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOAN B. GOTTSCHALL, District Judge.
Plaintiff AGA Shareholders, LLC (“AGA”) filed suit against defendant CSK Auto, Inc. (“CSK”) for breach of a requirements contract. CSK promptly moved to dismiss AGA’s complaint pursuant to Rules 12(b)(2) and (3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Specifically, CSK argues that the complaint must be dismissed because the court does not have personal jurisdiction over CSK and, even if it did, a forum selection clause contained in the contract applicable to this dispute divests the court of jurisdiction. For the reasons detailed…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Thomas P. Davis and Cathy M. Davis v. G.N. Mortgage Corporation and Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Dieter M. Hugel, Gulf Coast Marine, Incorporated, and Ocean Marine Indemnity Company v. The Corporation of Lloyd's, a United Kingdom CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Continental Casualty Company, an Illinois Insurance Company v. American National Insurance Company, a Texas Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Nucor Corporation v. Aceros Y Maquilas De Occidente, S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- AGA SHAREHOLDERS, LLC v. CSK Auto, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2008
- AKHTER v. MOONEYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- AKHTER v. MOONEYDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2023
- Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. B & M Marine Construction, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- EXTERNETWORKS, INC. v. THINK ANEW, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.