Legal Opinion
Magnussen v. Yak, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided June 22, 1994No. C92-1232DPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DIMMICK, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on defendant’s motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative, for a new trial. The Court, having considered the motions, memoranda, and affidavits submitted by the parties, and having heard oral argument on this matter, hereby denies the motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict and grants the motion for a new trial.
I
YAK first contends that the Court should grant a motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict.1 The Ninth Circuit recently reiterated the standard by which such a motion must be…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Usner v. Luckenbach Overseas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Usner v. Luckenbach Overseas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Debbie Floyd v. Larry Laws, and City of Sherwood, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Brooktree Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- 999, a Corporation, Plaintiff/appellee/cross-Appellant v. C.I.T. Corporation, a Corporation, Defendant/appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.