Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Mobil Oil Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 8, 1973Published

1Dissent

McGivern, J. P. (dissenting).

I believe the objection is well taken.

Indeed, the very fact that “ the investigation is very much alive and is continuing ”, a:s acknowledged in the majority opinion, is all the more reason for affording defendant some relief. The fact that the Donnelly Act inquisition parallels a similar civil action, between the same parties, based on the same facts, raises the questions of public policy, due process and equal protection as they affect the defendant in the civil action.

Nor is the law in this area settled. The last expression on the specific question at issue…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carlisle v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Matter of HoytNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. People v. Anaconda Wire & Cable Co.New York Supreme Court · 1965
  4. In re KenneyNew York Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API