Boozer v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Concurrence
CAMPBELL, Judge,
concurring in the denial of the State’s motion for leave to file motion for rehearing.
After carefully re-examining the issue in this case, I am now of the opinion that this *616case was correctly decided on original submission. However, the majority opinion on original submission fails to define the crucial phrase “reviewable rulings of the trial court”, Boozer v. State, No. 402-82, slip op. at 6, quoting Ortega v. State, 668 S.W.2d 701, 705, no. 10 (Tex.Cr.App.1984), and therefore fails to give the bench and bar adequate guidance in determining whether appellate courts will…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Greene v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ortega v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Todd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- McClure v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.