State v. Holloman
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Davis, J.:
The defendant, Edward E. Holloman, appeals his robbery conviction, claiming that the court should have excluded eyewitness identification testimony because the police procedures used were impermissibly suggestive. He also contends that the failure to give a lesser included offense instruction and a burden of proof instruction on alibi defense requires reversal. Finally, he claims the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction. We affirm.
On January 25, 1991, about 1:30 p.m., The Gap store in White Lakes Mall shopping center was robbed. The assistant manager, Amy Snow, was the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Malcus T. Clemons v. United States of America, David E. Clark v. United States of America, Alvin C. Hines v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. TrammellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
- State v. MaybinCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2000
- Jenkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004
- State v. DeffebaughSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
- State v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.