Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Nicholes

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. William T. Hodson, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carter

A judgment in this case confirming a special assessment against appellees’ property to curb and pave a street in Chicago was reversed in Nicholes v. City of Chicago, 184 Ill. 48, because of the refusal of the trial court to set aside the judgment, which was rendered by default after the death of appellees’ ancestor who was the owner of the property, and to let in appellees, his heirs, to defend. After the cause was remanded, and upon the trial, appellees gave in evidence, under their objections, the record of a former assessment proceeding and a judgment of confirmation against appellees’…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McChesney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  2. McChesney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. NodeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Oskvarek v. RichterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  3. Doremus v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API