Legal Opinion

United States v. Van Anh

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 11, 2008No. 07-1010 to 07-1012PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Circuit Judge.

A jury convicted Anh Van, 1 Khong Nguyen, and Thinh Cao of multiple counts of conspiring to use or using extortionate means to collect an extension of credit in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 894. On appeal, the defendants challenge their convictions, their sentences, or both. We affirm in all respects.

I. Background

We rehearse the background facts here, reserving the discussion of other facts for our later examination of defendants’ challenges. We view these facts in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict. United States v. Turner, 501 F.3d 59, 63 (1st Cir.2007).

Tommy…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. United States v. BashamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. Morales-MachucaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  3. City of Bangor v. Citizens Communications Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. Mangual-SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. StoneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API