United States v. Van Anh
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Circuit Judge.
A jury convicted Anh Van, 1 Khong Nguyen, and Thinh Cao of multiple counts of conspiring to use or using extortionate means to collect an extension of credit in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 894. On appeal, the defendants challenge their convictions, their sentences, or both. We affirm in all respects.
I. Background
We rehearse the background facts here, reserving the discussion of other facts for our later examination of defendants’ challenges. We view these facts in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict. United States v. Turner, 501 F.3d 59, 63 (1st Cir.2007).
Tommy…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. BashamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Morales-MachucaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- City of Bangor v. Citizens Communications Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Mangual-SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- United States v. StoneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.