Heywood v. Cruzan Motors, Inc.
District Court, Virgin Islands
1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The issue presented in this appeal from the Territorial Court is whether the court erred in dismissing the plaintiff’s action. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the dismissal.
*497I. FACTS
Plaintiff Maria Heywood (“Heywood”) purchased a 1980 Pontiac Phoenix from the defendant, Cruzan Motors, Inc. (“Cruzan”), on June 29, 1979. Shortly thereafter, Heywood discovered a multitude of defects1 and returned the automobile to Cruzan for repairs. Ultimately, she refused to take the car back from Cruzan and demanded that the dealer replace the vehicle.
On January 22, 1980, Heywood…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Manns v. the Leather Shop Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1997