Legal Opinion

United States v. Terrell

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 13, 2010No. 08-10560PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judges Graber and Bybee have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Tashima has so recommended.

The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. RApp. P. 35.

The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are denied. Judge M. Smith’s dissent from denial of rehearing en banc is…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Begay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Coker v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. James v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. FarrellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API