Legal Opinion
Dana Debs, Inc. v. Lady Rose Stores, Inc.
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided June 24, 1970PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBentley Kassal, J.
Both sides concede there is no issue of fact herein.
*698Plaintiff is a dress and suit manufacturer which received a written order from defendant for the purchase of some 288 garments. The order dated September 9, 1969, was on defendant’s printed form and it advised plaintiff to “ ship via Stuart, 453 W. 57th St.”.
Stuart Express Co., Inc., picked up such shipment on September 12, 1969 and issued its printed receipt to plaintiff, naming defendant as consignee for such garments. Said receipt contains the printed names of 12 different consignees, including the printed name of defendant, together with…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Standard Casing Co. v. . California Casing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Disch v. National Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
3Cited by9 opinions
- S-Creek Ranch, Inc. v. Monier & CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1973
- Rice MacHinery, Inc. v. NorbergSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
- Matsushita Electric Corp. of America v. SalopekCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
- La Casse v. BlausteinCivil Court of the City of New York · 1978
- Windows, Inc. v. Jordan Panel Systems Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.