Legal Opinion

In re Nauth

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 25, 2016No. 15C A0025-MPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as In re Nauth,

2016-Ohio-5089.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MEDINA ) IN RE: NAUTH C.A. No. 15CA0025-M APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF MEDINA, OHIO CASE No. 2011 05 GI 00031 DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY Dated: July 25, 2016 HENSAL, Judge. {¶1} Marie Nauth appeals a judgment of the Medina County Court of Common Pleas, Probate Division, denying her motion to terminate guardianship. For the following reasons, this Court affirms. I. {¶2} Mrs. Nauth married Loren Nauth in 1986. It was Mr. Nauth’s second…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. JPMorgan Chase Bank, Natl. Assn. v. BurdenOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. In Re Guardianship of ThomasOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Wilburn v. AllenOhio Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Guardianship of NauthOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Weckel v. Cole + Russell ArchitectsOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. In re Guardianship of WhitmerOhio Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API