Legal Opinion

Henley v. Stevenson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 9, 1903No. 13,071PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Douglas district court; O. A. Smart, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Pollock, J.':

This is a proceeding byW. H. Stevenson against A. Henley as a stockholder in the Consolidated Barb-wire Company, a Kansas corporation, upon *5motion to procure an order permitting execution to issue against such stockholder on a judgment recovered by Stevenson against the corporation. The facts, as shown by the record, are that on February 25, 1900, Stevenson procured a judgment against the corporation in the sum of $2875 and costs of action, taxed at $636.45. The nature of the litigation out of which this judgment arose, or the character of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Woodworth v. BowlesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  2. Waller v. HamerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Douglass v. LoftusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. Henley v. MyersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Guilbert v. KessingerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Pusey & Jones Co. v. LoveSupreme Court of Delaware · 1906
  5. Rowland v. Forest Park Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API