Small v. Bradley
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1DissentPittman, Judge
I respectfully dissent. I do not read Matthews v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 286 Ala. 598, 243 So.2d 703 (1971), to require additional instructions when a jury poses questions after retiring to deliberate. Matthews stands for the proposition that a judge may not further instruct the jury after its retirement without notifying counsel or without some special circumstances that reasonably prevented notification. Matthews, 286 Ala. at 604, 243 So.2d at 708. Nothing in Matthews requires a judge to answer or to address a jury question, particularly when the trial court had previously instructed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jeanne L. Shultz v. Bernard Rice, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Deutcsh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
- Matthews v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
- Commercial Union Assurance Companies v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. And Whirlpool, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- McKinney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993