Legal Opinion

Riggs v. State Ex Rel. Jones

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 22, 1927No. 4 Div. 324PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The rules of evidence in civil actions govern in proceedings- in the name of the state for condemnation of vehicles used in the transportation of prohibited liquors. 33 C. J. p. 687; Dowda v. State, 203 Ala. 441, 83 So. 324; Toole v. State, 170 Ala. 41, 54 So. 195.

No predicate was required for the introduction of the declarations of the owner tending to connect him with the illegal act. They are admissible as declarations against interest in civil actions, not as confessions in criminal prosecutions.

Evidence of good character of the owner and claimant in the proceeding, either generally or as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Toole v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Drummond v. DrummondSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  3. Dowda v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  4. Greenwood Cafe v. WalshAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lovett v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Henry Grady Snead v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
  3. Davis v. State ex rel. PettusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  4. Malholtra v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  5. McNeese v. State ex rel. CramerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API