Legal Opinion
Bannum, Inc. v. City of St. Louis
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided July 11, 2006No. ED 87218PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROY L. RICHTER, Judge.
Bannum, Inc. appeals the trial court’s judgment granting the City of St. Louis’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
Bannum, Inc., (“Bannum”) a Kentucky corporation, operates halfway houses for federal prisoners under contract with the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”). In March 2000, BOP published a request for proposals for a St. Louis contract. It is typical practice for a bidder to show that it has an available site where a halfway house may be legally operated.
Bannum attempted to identify sites that would comply with the City of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Doe v. BoltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lewis v. BiegelMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Arthur Brown v. Kansas City Live, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- A.H. Ex Rel. Hubbard v. Midwest Bus Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Boone v. City of St. LouisDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
- Chastain v. City of Kansas City MissouriDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2022
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.