Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Gann Law Books, Inc.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided July 29, 2013No. Civil Action No. 11-cv-4287 (KM)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McNULTY, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court upon Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Complaint, which is pleaded as a class action. Plaintiff, on behalf of himself and *582others similarly situated, alleges that Defendants have “caused to be sent thousands of unsolicited fax advertisements for goods and/or services without proper-opt-out notices,” in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227 (“TCPA”). Complaint, filed July 26, 2011, ECF No. 1 (“Complaint”). The only private cause of action explicitly provided for in TCPA is a state-court right of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Landsman & Funk PC v. Skinder-Strauss AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  4. Erienet, Inc. Sandra MacKenzie John Knauer Frank Mezler, Jr. v. Velocity Net, Inc. Thomas Dylewski Chad FerenackCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  5. Mims v. Arrow Financial Services, LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. AMATO v. SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API