Fitzgerald v. Gann Law Books, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McNULTY, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court upon Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Complaint, which is pleaded as a class action. Plaintiff, on behalf of himself and *582others similarly situated, alleges that Defendants have “caused to be sent thousands of unsolicited fax advertisements for goods and/or services without proper-opt-out notices,” in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227 (“TCPA”). Complaint, filed July 26, 2011, ECF No. 1 (“Complaint”). The only private cause of action explicitly provided for in TCPA is a state-court right of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Landsman & Funk PC v. Skinder-Strauss AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Erienet, Inc. Sandra MacKenzie John Knauer Frank Mezler, Jr. v. Velocity Net, Inc. Thomas Dylewski Chad FerenackCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Mims v. Arrow Financial Services, LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- AMATO v. SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2021