Legal Opinion

Tanenbaum v. Federal Match Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 9, 1906Published

Appeal by the plaintiff, Moses Tanenbaum, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Mew York on the 25th day of May, - 1905, upon the verdict of a jury rendered, by direction of the court, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 7th day of June, 1905, denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

The facts here presented are substantially the same as those presented on the former appeal (Tanenbaum v. Federal Match Co., No. 2, 102 App. Div. 524), and the judgment would. be affirmed on the opinion then delivered were it not for the fact that Upon the argument of the present appeal it was suggested that the justice writing the former opinion misapprehended the facts, especially as to the amount of insurance which the defendant was required to take during the first nine months of the term of the contract, and also in assuming that the policies which were issued after the fire…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Flagg v. FiskAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  2. Tanenbaum v. Federal Match Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API