Legal Opinion

Maggard v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 17, 1941PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Fulton

— Affirming.

The appellants, James Maggard, Russell Maggard, Henry Clay Lewis, A. C. Howard, Bentley Fields and Roy Fields, were convicted for the crime of confederating and banding together to intimidate and alarm Pit Nicholson in violation of Section 1241a-l, Kentucky Statutes and bring this appeal, the first ground for reversal urged being that the indictment was insufficient.

In what has many times been referred to by this court as the accusatory part of the indictment the appellants were charged with the crime of “confederating and banding together to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Overstreet v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. Deaton and Boggs v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  3. Drury v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  4. Miller v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  5. Commonwealth v. HightowerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WolfordKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Knuckles v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
  3. Noble v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
  4. Rose v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
  5. Meader v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API