Legal Opinion
Grimes v. Dayton-Walther Corp.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 7, 1987No. C-3-85-026PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION; FINDINGS OF FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; FURTHER PROCEDURES SET FOR PAYMENT OF BENEFITS DUE PLAINTIFFS, TO WIT: DEFENDANT GRANTED TWENTY DAYS FROM RECEIPT OF OPINION TO FILE PLAN TO GUARANTEE FUTURE BENEFITS AND PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANT GRANTED TWENTY DAYS TO FILE STIPULATIONS AS TO BENEFITS PAST DUE OR TO NOTIFY COURT THAT SUCH STIPULATIONS CANNOT BE REACHED
RICE, District Judge.
This case was heard by the Court, sitting as trier of fact, on September 16-23, 1986. On November 11, 1986, the Court filed an Opinion (Doc. # 64) indicating its intent to enter judgment for the Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw), and Local 134, Uaw v. Yard-Man, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Transportation-Communication Employees Union v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Murphy v. Heppenstall Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Paul W. Weimer v. Kurz-Kasch, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bacon v. Smith Barney Shearson, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996
- Dematic Corp. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
- Ricke v. Armco, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1995
- United Steelworkers, AFL-CIO v. United Engineering, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1993