Bell v. Goodwin
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
In Ex parte Horace C. Wilkinson, 126 So. 102 1 submitted, considered, and decided in connection with this cause, we dealt with the question of jurisdiction and the validity of the order appointing the receiver on collateral attack.
This is an appeal from the decree appointing the receiver, and involves the propriety of such appointment.
Errors are assigned only on behalf of Mrs. Clemmie L. Bell and Louise Snow Bell, wife and daughter of A. W. Bell, deceased.
We need consider only questions of concern to them as respondents in the cause.
Some questions urged on this appeal were decided in Ex parte…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Moritz & Weil v. Miller, Schram & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Ex Parte WilkinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Davis v. SwansonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Warren & Co. v. PittsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
- Davis v. Stovall & BrotherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Drewen v. Bank of Manhattan Co. of City of NYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Trotter v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Barnes v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Bedsole v. TillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Ex Parte WilkinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929