Legal Opinion
2 Fifth Avenue Co. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 14, 1977PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
In this proceeding under CPLR article 78 petitioner landlord seeks mandamus to compel respondent Conciliation and Appeals Board to decide its application for a hardship rent increase in accordance with the statute in force when the application was filed in November, 1974 instead of the less favorable superseding statute enacted effective the following July. Petitioner asserts that respondent’s unwarranted delay in processing the application was deliberate and willful, its inaction having been due to its dissatisfaction with the earlier "ratio formula” which, by a "reinterpretation” of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Our Lady of Good Counsel Roman Catholic Church & School v. BallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- MATTER OF OUR LADY OF GOOD COUNSEL ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH & SCH. v. BallNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Vanderbilt 77th Associates v. Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
3Cited by5 opinions
- Parkview Holding Corp. v. JoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Central Living, Inc. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Halprin v. 2 Fifth Avenue Co.New York Supreme Court · 1979
- Halprin v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Park West Village Tenants' Ass'n v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979