Laubach v. New York Life Insurance

Reno, P. J.,

1The defendant withdrew its motion for a new trial. We are thereby deprived of correcting what we verily believe was “a capricious refusal to believe the credible and [practically] undisputed testimony” offered by defendant: Dzsujko v. Eureka-Maryland Assurance Corp., 109 Pa. Superior Ct. 9. Doubtless, defendant feels that it can safely rest its case on the motion for judgment n. o. v.

Taking up that motion, we shall consider “the testimony not only in a light most advantageous to plaintiff, all conflicts therein being resolved in his favor, but he must also be given the benefit of…