Legal Opinion

Hatchigian v. Koch

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 16, 1989No. 1719PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

The novel issue presented is whether a Pennsylvania District Court judgment for the plaintiff has res judicata effect where the defendant appeals the judgment to the trial court, the plaintiff then suffers a judgment of non pros for failing to file a complaint in the trial court, and the plaintiff later institutes a new action in the trial court alleging the same cause of action against the same parties. We find that the judgment of the District Court does not have res judicata effect.

On November 19, 1984, Hatchigian filed a complaint in district court seeking $4,000 for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bucci v. Detroit Fire & Marine Ins.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. A.C. Elfman & Sons, Inc. v. ClimeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Doner v. Jowitt and Rodgers Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gutman v. GiordanoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Price v. Bensalem Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Velazquez v. UPMC Bedford Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Selvaggi v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Municipality of Monroeville v. LiberatoreCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API