Phillip Wallace v. Merle D. Robinson, Zenon Symanski, Michael O'leary, and Michael P. Lane
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
914 F.2d 869
Phillip WALLACE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Merle D. ROBINSON, Zenon Symanski, Michael O'Leary, and
Michael P. Lane, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 88-1806.
United States Court of Appeals,
Seventh Circuit.
Argued May 14, 1990.
Decided Sept. 26, 1990.
Cudahy, Circuit Judge, concurred in part and dissented in part and filed opinion.
Easterbrook, Circuit Judge, concurred in judgment and filed opinion.
Jerold S. Solovy, William A. VonHoene, Jr., Thomas S. O'Neill, Jenner & Block, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff-appellant.
Phillip Wallace, Joliet, Ill., pro se.
Diane Curry Grapsas, Daniel N. Malato, Asst.…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurring in the judgment.
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.