Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer Dist. v. Bath Twp. (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 2015No. 2013-1770Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partFrench, J.

{¶ 23} I agree with the majority that appellant, the Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District (the “Sewer District”), has authority under both R.C. Chapter 6119 and its charter to implement a regional stormwater-management program, but I respectfully disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the Sewer District has statutory authority to finance that program by presently assessing the stormwater fees that are set out in Title V of its Code of Regulations, which implements the stormwater-management program. Accordingly, I concur in part and dissent in part.

{¶ 24} Both the majority opinion and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer Dist. v. Bath Twp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer Dist. v. Bath Twp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API