Legal Opinion

State v. Crossen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1914No. 11438PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Ferry county, Blake, J., entered February 19, 1913, upon a trial and conviction of grand larceny.

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

Appeal from a conviction of grand larceny. The information charged the appellant with stealing “from a pasture and range one head of neat cattle,” etc., and was evidently drawn under Rem. & Bal. Code, § 2605, subd. 4 (P. C. 135 § 703), including within the crime of grand larceny the unlawful taking of animals from any range or pasture. The defense was a taking under claim of right, appellant claim*439ing that he had purchased a calf from an Indian; that he went out on the range and drove in the calf he supposed he had purchased, and butchered it; and if the calf taken was the property of the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. McCartyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
  2. State v. HeyesWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. State v. BehrensWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API