Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sommer v. Cate

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 12, 1867Published

Appeal from Polk District Gowrt. Suit against defendant, a drayman, as common carrier. There was a demurrer to the petition, which was sustained. Plaintiff appeals.

1Dissent

Wright, J.,

dissenting. — If I did not believe that this precise question had been presented in the pleadings and arguments, and decided by this court, I might possibly yield to the construction above given to the statute. In Bowen & King v. Hale (4 Iowa, 430), however, plaintiffs sued before a justice for* the value of a demijohn of brandy, lost by the defendant as a common carrier.

Defendant demurred because the petition “ did not show that plaintiffs were agents duly appointed by law.” This was overruled. The answer sets up that the “ agreement to convey was void,” and that the “ laws of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. MaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  2. Bowen v. HaleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1857

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API