Legal Opinion

Fulkerson v. Akers

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 3, 1911PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas Branch, Third Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Affirming.

The plaintiff, a boy fourteen years of age, while playing on Third street, near Green, in the city of Louisville, on December 17, 1909, was struck by an automobile belonging to Mrs. Frank Guthrie Akers. His leg was fractured, and be brought this action against M. L. Akers and Frank Guthrie Akers, bis wife, to recover damages. M. L. Akers testified that be did not own tbe automobile, nor did be employ or pay tbe chauffeur. Tbe trial court then directed a verdict in bis favor. Of this action of the court there is no complaint.…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weidner v. OtterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Akers v. FulkersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. VandiverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  4. Baldwin's Administrator v. MaggardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API