Harms v. Burt
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Brazil, J.:
Appellants S. A. Harms and LaWanda Harms, et al, obtained a judgment against defendant Veva Burt and were proceeding with a writ of execution on Burt’s former residence. Appellees Capitol Federal Savings and Loan Association (Capitol Federal) and Joseph and Victoria Wright intervened and filed a motion claiming their purchase money interests, though acquired later in time, were entitled to be equitably subrogated to a position senior to the appellants’ judgment lien. The district court invoked the doctrine of equitable subrogation and reordered the Hen priorities on the property.
Thi…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bankers Trust Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
- Kuhn v. National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Hargis v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
- Shade v. Wheatcraft Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1991
- Bi-State Development Co. v. Shafer, Kline & Warren, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Houston v. Bank of America Federal Savings BankNevada Supreme Court · 2003
- State Ex Rel. Graeber v. Marion County Landfill, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. RobertsKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
- Wells Fargo Bank, Minnesota, N.A. v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
- Tri-State Truck Insurance v. First National BankDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.