Legal Opinion

Harms v. Burt

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided February 15, 2002No. 86,603PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brazil, J.:

Appellants S. A. Harms and LaWanda Harms, et al, obtained a judgment against defendant Veva Burt and were proceeding with a writ of execution on Burt’s former residence. Appellees Capitol Federal Savings and Loan Association (Capitol Federal) and Joseph and Victoria Wright intervened and filed a motion claiming their purchase money interests, though acquired later in time, were entitled to be equitably subrogated to a position senior to the appellants’ judgment lien. The district court invoked the doctrine of equitable subrogation and reordered the Hen priorities on the property.

Thi…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bankers Trust Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
  2. Kuhn v. National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  3. Hargis v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  4. Shade v. Wheatcraft Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  5. Bi-State Development Co. v. Shafer, Kline & Warren, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Houston v. Bank of America Federal Savings BankNevada Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State Ex Rel. Graeber v. Marion County Landfill, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  3. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. RobertsKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Wells Fargo Bank, Minnesota, N.A. v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Tri-State Truck Insurance v. First National BankDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API