Legal Opinion
UNION CITY ASSOC. v. Union City
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 7, 1988PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
223 N.J. Super. 316 (1988)
538 A.2d 836
UNION CITY ASSOCIATES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
CITY OF UNION CITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted January 13, 1988.
Decided March 7, 1988.
Before Judges FURMAN, LONG and SCALERA.
Mandelbaum & Mandelbaum, attorneys for plaintiff-appellant (Steven R. Irwin, on the brief).
Herbert H. Fine, attorney for defendant-respondent.
The opinion of this court was delivered by LONG, J.A.D.
The issue on this appeal is whether plaintiff, Union City Associates (taxpayer), may invoke the protection of the Freeze Act (N.J.S.A.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hackensack Water Co. v. Division of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Curtiss Wright Corp. v. Wood-Ridge BoroughNew Jersey Tax Court · 1982
- Union City Associates v. Union CityNew Jersey Tax Court · 1986
- City of Newark v. American Realty & Investment Co.New Jersey Tax Court · 1948
3Cited by6 opinions
- Union City Associates v. City of Union CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- UNION CITY ASSOC. v. Union CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Union City Associates v. City of Union CityNew Jersey Tax Court · 1989
- Rainhold Holding Co. v. Freehold TownshipNew Jersey Tax Court · 1996
- City of East Orange v. 280 South Harrison Street AssociatesNew Jersey Tax Court · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.