Legal Opinion

Selsor v. Turnbull

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 14, 1997No. P 97-911PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION AND/OR MANDAMUS, AND DISSOLVING STAY OF PROCEEDINGS

The Petitioner, Michael B. Selsor, has filed an application to assume original jurisdiction and a petition for writ of prohibition and/or mandamus asking this Court to strike the Bill of Particulars and prohibit the District Court of Tulsa County from conducting a jury trial which exposes Petitioner to the death penalty, or to the possibility of life without parole, in Case No. CF 75-2181. Initially, this Court stayed proceedings in that case and directed a response from the Respondent or his…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Roberts v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. H-CHH Associates v. Citizens for Representative GovernmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Riggs v. BranchCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Selsor v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  2. Mooney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
  3. Selsor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
  4. Mooney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API