Legal Opinion

Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Tucker

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 31, 1954No. 11840PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant’s petition for rehearing, together with brief of amici curiae, having been considered by the Court;

And the Court being of the opinion that the following quotation in the Court’s opinion of March 8, 1954, taken from the opinion in Majestic v. Louisville & N. R. Co., 6 Cir., 147 F.2d 621, 624-625, which in turn was based on Nashville & Chattanooga R. Co. v. Anthony, 69 Tenn. 516, does not properly state the present Tennessee rule as explained in Tennessee cases subsequent to Nashville & Chattanooga R. Co. v. Anthony, supra; see Louisville, N. & G. S. R. Co. v. Reidmond, 79 Tenn. 205,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Majestic v. Louisville & NR Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
  2. Gaines v. Tennessee Cent. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Louisville N.R.R. Co. v. Frakes and PayneCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928
  4. Union Traction Co. v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
  5. Louisville, Nashville & Great Southern Railroad v. ReidmondTennessee Supreme Court · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Elena Castilleja and Minor Children v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company, a Corporation v. Floyd Farmer, Administrator of the Estate of Donald Lewis Farmer, Deceased, Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company, a Corporation v. Willie Farmer, Administrator of the Estate of Thomas Donald Farmer, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
  3. Southern Railway Company v. Joseph Fred Elliott and Elizabeth H. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. FarmerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API