Legal Opinion
Flora v. Ashcroft
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 7, 2004No. Nos. 02-73886Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Manuel Flora, Josie Madronio Flora and Mark Edison Flora petition for review of an Immigration Judge’s determination that they are removable because they were paroled into the United States, their parole status has terminated, and they do not meet asylum requirements. We review the Immigration Judge’s decision because the Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed without opinion. Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845, 849 (9th Cir. 2003).
We take testimony by the Floras as true because the Immigration Judge found them credible. Vukmirovic v. Ashcroft, 362 F.3d 1247, 1251 (9th…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gerardo Bibiano Falcon Carriche Theresa v. De Falcon Carriche and Christina Pamela Falcon Bibiano v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Lucio Ricardo Alvarez-Santos, AKA Luciano Ricardo Alvarez AKA Lucio Ricardo Alvarez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Ortiz v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Perlito Capili Sulit Estella Gonzalez Sulit v. Thomas J. Schiltgen, District Director, Immigration Naturalization Service, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Predrag Vukmirovic v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.