Legal Opinion

Army v. Dunlap

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 2017No. 15–17–08Published

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-counterclaim defendants-appellants, Kedar Army and Mary Lou Army (collectively, "appellants"), bring this appeal from the June 20, 2017, judgment of the Van Wert Municipal Court awarding judgment in favor of defendant-counterclaim plaintiff-appellee, Rochelle Dunlap ("Dunlap"). On appeal, appellants contend that the trial court erred by finding an oral *1087 "lease-purchase agreement" for a mobile home invalid and contrary to law.

Relevant Facts and Procedural History

{¶ 2} In early August of 2014, Dunlap and her son Schuyler were looking for a mobile home to rent or purchase as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Sherman v. HainesOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Goldberger v. Bexley PropertiesOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Shepard's Mobile Home Park, Ltd. v. SigmonOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API