Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People ex rel. Attorney General v. Cassiday

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1911No. 7228Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Hill

It had not been my intention to give a written expression of my views upon the very important questions under consideration, but simply to concur in the ultimate conclusions reached in the opinion of Mr. Justice Bailey, holding that art. XX, in its entirety, is a part of the constitution as announced by the late Chief Justice Steele in the case of The People v. Sours, 31 Colo. 369.

I am unable to appreciate or conceive wherein the people, in their sovereign capacity, have not the right to say that the power may be vested in the people of the city and county of Denver, to designate the persons…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Elder v. SoursSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. LunneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  3. People ex rel. Lawson v. StoddardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API