Legal Opinion
BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Radium2 Capital, LLC
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 21, 2024No. 1:22-cv-08328Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BMO HARRIS BANK N.A., Plaintiff, 22 Civ. 8328 (DEH) v. MEMORANDUM OPINION RADIUM2 CAPITAL, LLC, AND ORDER Defendant. DALE E. HO, United States District Judge: Before the Court are Plaintiff BMO Harris Bank’s (“BMO’s”) motion to amend its complaint, ECF No. 45, and Defendant Radium2 Capital’s (“Radium’s”) motion to dismiss the case, ECF No. 46. For the reasons discussed below, BMO’s motion is DENIED as futile, and Radium’s motion is GRANTED for BMO’s failure to timely bring its claims. BACKGROUND I. Factual Background The following…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Edward E. Lucente, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. International Business MacHines Corporation, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Abbas v. DixonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.