Legal Opinion

Wier v. Howard Hughes Medical Institute

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided October 26, 1979PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARVEL, Chancellor:

This action to determine the appropriate person or entities to manage and control the policies of the defendant charitable corporation was filed jointly in the names of the Attorney General of the State of Delaware and of William R. Lummis, the Delaware ancillary administrator of the estate of the late Howard R. Hughes, Jr. The defendant Howard Hughes Medical Institute is a tax-exempt charitable corporation incorporated in Delaware and founded by the late Howard R. Hughes, Jr., in 1953, the latter having constituted himself at that time Trustee of the Institute with full…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. McCaffrey v. Pittsburgh Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. New York Trust Co. v. RileySupreme Court of Delaware · 1940
  4. Trustees of Andover Theological Seminary v. Visitors of the Theological InstitutionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  5. Keck v. McKinstrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1928

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Oberly v. KirbySupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  2. Carl J. Herzog Foundation, Inc. v. University of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Oberly v. Howard Hughes Medical InstituteCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1984
  4. Courtenay C. & Lucy Patten Davis Foundation v. Colorado State University Research FoundationWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. American Board of TradeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API